Zelensky furious: Russia stops Ukraine counterattack due to air superiority

“Since we do not have an air force and Russia does, they are blocking us from the air, they are stopping our counterattack,” Zelensky said from Kiev, accusing the West of

Ukrainian President admits that Russia, thanks to its air superiority, stopped the Ukrainian counterattackVolodymyr Zelensky expressing his dissatisfaction with the a slowdown in Western military aid and delays in sanctions against Moscow.
“Since we do not have an air force and Russia does, they are blocking our air access. They are stopping our counterattack,” Zelensky stressed from Kiev, condemning “processes that become more complicated and slower, in terms of sanctions or the purchase of weapons” from the West.
“The war is slowing down, we recognize that,” he said.
“When our partners ask ‘what’s the next step in the counterattack?, my answer is that today our measures are probably faster than the new sanctions’ targeting Russia,” the Ukrainian president said.
kyiv regularly complains about the slowness of retaliatory measures aimed at slowing down Russian military operations.

The West responsible for the defeat

Zelensky once again emphasized that if the West had delivered long-range munitions more quickly, which make it possible to strike Russian defense positions, in the rear and of the Russian supply chain, the Ukrainian army would also act more quickly.
“A specific weapon has a specific impact.
The more powerful and long-range it is, the faster the counterattack will be.”
Westerners are dropping such ammunition in Ukraine, fearing kyiv will use it. despite its commitments, to bomb Russian territory, which could lead to an escalation of the war.
Ukraine has also been complaining for months about the slow pace of negotiations. for the delivery of F-16 combat aircraftwhile the country has a small and aging fleet of Soviet-era aircraft, reports Agence France-Presse (AFP).
After months of procrastination, several dozen of these American combat planes will be delivered by European countries, but it will take months to reach the battlefield, especially given the pilots’ training time.

When Stoltenberg ignored Zelensky

Discussions on Ukraine’s possible NATO membership seem far from over.
Today, NATO’s top official says Kiev is on the verge of gaining its long-awaited membership, which is surprising given that Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky was completely ignored at the last NATO summit. NATO.
During a meeting with members of the European Parliament on September 9, NATO Secretary General Jens Stoltenberg stressed that the military alliance “shares the same values ​​and the same challenges” with Ukraine, commenting on the recent progress towards the inclusion of Kiev in the alliance.
Recalling the Vilnius Summit, Stoltenberg said that while he did not give a precise “road map” on the path to membership, he promised Kiev that certain steps would be taken in the process.

A huge bluff

The proposed measures aim to increase military interoperability, create an official representative council for Ukraine within NATO and simplify the process, with the possibility of bypassing some bureaucratic requirements that other candidates must meet.
Considering that these measures have already been implemented, Stoltenberg believes that Kyiv is closer than ever to membership.
“We reiterated that Ukraine would become a member of NATO, but then we added three elements that bring it closer to membership…
And these three elements, interoperability, the NATO-Ukraine Council and the removal of the requirement for an action plan for membership, prove that Ukraine has never been closer to membership in NATO than today,” he noted.
However, once again, Stoltenberg gave no “road map” for kyiv in his latest speech.
He simply said that fulfilling the three pledges would bring membership closer now than it was before, but he did not specify what would happen next in that process.
No announcements were made regarding further accession negotiations, with discussions limited simply to saying they were “close”, without any concrete evidence to support this conclusion.
In practice, these remarks prove that Stoltenberg is bluffing regarding Ukraine’s membership in NATO.

What does NATO want to avoid?
To date, no significant progress has been made in this process and NATO does not appear interested in moving this agenda forward.
However, in order to maintain a positive public image of the alliance and avoid criticism from Kiev and the mainstream media, Stoltenberg constantly reiterates his commitment to membership and tries to give new “hope” to the state satellite.
The aim is to make Ukraine and its supporters, as well as Western public opinion, believe that accession will take place, even if all the evidence suggests that it is “frozen”.
Refusing to accept Ukraine into the alliance is the right position to take, as the country is currently in a state of open conflict.
Taking into account NATO’s collective defense rules, the entry of the kyiv regime would mean the immediate start of an open global conflict.
It is known that kyiv fights for NATO on the battlefield, obeying the orders of Western leaders and acting as a proxy state.
However, the neo-Nazi regime’s participation in the alliance’s war plans will certainly remain limited to this proxy role.
NATO wants war with Russia, but does not want to risk losing troops in direct conflict with no chance of victory.
For the alliance, it is more interesting to maintain a proxy war, trying to “wear down” Russia in the long term without causing as much immediate damage to Western countries.

The proof of the bluff

Evidence of NATO’s lack of interest in outright war can be seen in the fact that the alliance ignored Ukraine’s false claims about “Russian attacks” on Poland and Romania, for example.
If NATO wanted a direct conflict with Russia, it would certainly adopt the Ukrainian narrative – but this is not part of the West’s plans, at least for the moment.
Western countries know that to prevent the process of geopolitical transition towards multipolarity, it will be necessary to neutralize Russia and China at the same time.
It is impossible to win a war with both powers at the same time, so the gamble is to maintain proxy conflicts with Russia and launch an anti-China military campaign in the future.
In this sense, the current conflict in Ukraine should be seen as only one element of NATO’s real anti-Russian strategy.
There is nothing so “special” in kyiv that could legitimize Western intervention in its favor.

Ukrainians are cannon fodder

The military aid provided by NATO is not motivated by “common values” or by “the defense of democracy”, as the propaganda claims, emphasizes geopolitical analyst Lucas Leiroz in his article.
It is simply a way of indirectly prolonging the conflict with Russia.
For the West, Ukrainians are just cannon fodder in this scenario.
It’s a shocking reality, but Ukraine agreed to participate in this war plan long ago when it chose to align with the West in 2014.
So, unless new factors emerge in the near future showing real progress toward Ukraine’s membership, Stoltenberg’s remarks are seen as a simple bluff, as Kiev’s access does not appear to be in NATO’s interest.


Leave a Comment